Shimano Claris and Shimano Tourney are both lower-end groupsets in Shimano’s road hierarchy.
Out of the two, Shimano Claris components are known to be of notably higher class.
However, higher-end components are not the best choice for every project. After all, sometimes it’s more practical to buy a cheaper car than a shinier one.
On the basis of this notion, a comparison between Claris and Tourney isn’t out of place, especially from the perspective of a beginner.
The aim of this post is to compare the two groupsets and help people choose the one that fits their needs better.
Claris and Tourney In Shimano’s Groupset Hierarchy
Groupset | Speeds | |
Beginner | Tourney | 8 |
Entry Level | Claris | 8 |
Recreation | Sora, Tiagra | 9, 10 |
Enthusiast | 105 | 11 |
Racing | Ultegra | 11 |
Pro-racing | Dura-Ace | 11 |
The Main Differences Between Shimano Claris and Tourney
- Focus
Shimano Claris is strictly a road groupset whereas Tourney is found on entry-level MTBs, road bikes, and urban models. That property makes Tourney more universal whereas Claris is more “focused”.
- Claris = Newer Technology
Claris components are more modern in comparison to Tourney.
- The Cranks
Claris cranks are designed for external bottom brackets. Consequently, the bottom bracket spindle is attached to the drive-side crank. This property is considered beneficial because the spindle and the cranks can be more rigid. The lower degree of flex results in greater efficiency.
In different, Tourney cranks use the old square taper bottom brackets and do not offer sufficient stiffness for people who look for a more “luxurious” performance.
That being said, the non-pretentiousness and affordability of Tourney cranks are its strengths too.
- Rear Derailleur
The Tourney rear derailleur meets the minimum requirements for performance. In short, it covers the basics and nothing more.
The spring mechanism isn’t as robust and the chain routinely hits the chainstay (hence why it’s recommended to cover the drive-side chainstay with a protector or else the chain will quickly remove the paint and dig into the frame).
The Claris rear derailleurs are slightly better and offer a smoother shifting experience and better chain retention. That being said, they still lack in comparison to 105 groupsets.
- Shifters
The shifters of Claris are very similar to those found on higher-end bikes when it comes to both looks and performance. Tourney brake-shifters, on the other hand, have external brake cables (the brake cable and housing do not run under the bar tape) and a small lever secondary lever rather than one under the main brake lever.
- Brakes
Currently, there are no modern Shimano Tourney calipers. That being said, there are old-school Tourney center-pull brakes. But there is little incentive to go for them unless the goal is to have a retro setup.
Cassette Comparison
Shimano Claris
Shimano Claris cassettes have 8-speed available in five gradations:
Cassette Model | Total capacity | Sprocket Material | Individual cogs* | Weight |
ICSHG508225 | 12-25 | Steel | 12-13-15-17-19-21-23-25 | 323g |
ECSHG508128P | 11-28 | Steel | 11-13-15-17-19-21-24-28 | 330-350g |
ECSHG508130P | 11-30 | Steel | 11-13-15-17-20-23-26-30 | 330-350g |
ECSHG508132P | 11-32 | Steel | 11-13-15-18-21-24-28-32 | 330-360g |
ECSHG508134P | 11-34 | Steel | 11-13-15-18-21-24-28-34 | 330-360g |
Note: The weight data is approximate.
*This column shows the number of teeth per cog.
Shimano Tourney
Cassette Model | Total capacity | Sprocket Material | Individual cogs* | Weight |
CS-HG20-7 (7-speed model) | 12-28 | Steel | 12-14-16-18-21-24-28 | 259g |
CS-HG20-7 (7-speed model) | 11-32 | Steel | 12-14-16-18-21-26-32 | 260g |
CS-HG200-8 | 11-32 | Steel | 12-14-16-18-21-24-28-32 | 312g |
Conclusion: Shimano Claris cassettes come in greater variety. The 11-25 models offer smooth transitions between the gears whereas the 11-34 units provide a lower first gear which makes climbing easier. Meanwhile, Tourney cassettes are very limited.
Note: Tourney offers a great number of freewheels that aren’t included in this comparison. Freewheels are not part of Claris’ repertoire and are found only on old and budget builds.
Winner: Claris
Shifter Comparison
Shimano Claris Brake-Shifters | Shimano Tourney Brake-Shifters | |
Type | DCL Dual control | DCL Dual control |
Optical gear display | Yes (not all models) | Yes |
Reach Adjust | Yes | Yes |
Lever Material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Speeds | 8 | 7 |
Hidden Cable Routing | Yes | No |
Hydraulic Disc Brake Option | No | No |
Approximate Weight (pair) | 500 grams | 500 grams |
The main downside of Tourney levers is that they’re designed for 7-speeds. This means that the rear shifter has only 6 clicks and cannot be used with 8-speed cassettes. This property further narrows down the cassette options that Tourney offers.
A 7-speed cassette has larger transitions between the gears making it harder to maintain smooth cadence. Cadence is a term describing the rotation of the cranks per 1 minute. A higher cadence such as 90 RPM is considered more efficient and allows the rider to maintain a higher average speed.
That said, both brake-shifter types have many overlapping points on paper. The overall quality and comfort of Claris are higher nonetheless.
Winner: Claris
Front Derailleur Comparison
Shimano Claris Front Derailleur | Shimano Tourney Front Derailleur | |
Special Adjustments Features | No | No |
Front Derailleur Type | Brazed-On, Clamp, High Clamp | Clamp, High Clamp |
Shifting system | 8-speed | 6,7,8-speed |
Chainset compatibility | Double and Triple | Double and Triple |
Weight | about 128 grams | about 185 grams |
Front derailleurs are much simpler than the rear mech. Consequently, one can use an entry-level model with satisfactory results. Claris front derailleurs are lighter and some people could argue that they look better.
Nonetheless, Tourney front derailleurs offer satisfactory performance too.
Shimano Claris Rear Derailleur | Shimano Tourney Rear Derailleur | |
Material | Aluminum, glass-fiber reinforced polymer | Aluminum, glass-fiber reinforced polymer |
Speeds | 8 | 6,7,8 |
Top-Normal spring type | Double servo | Yes | Yes |
Barrel Adjuster | Yes | Yes |
Max. front difference | 20 | 20 |
Low sprocket|Max. | 34 | 34 |
Low sprocket|Min. | 25 | 28 |
Top sprocket|Max. | 13 | 14 |
Top sprocket|Min. | 11 | 11 |
Pulley|Teeth | 11 | 13 |
Once again, the stats of both derailleurs are similar, but the real difference is in the details. Tourney meets the bare minimum criteria in terms of performance and quality whereas Claris is visibly on a higher level.
That said, Tourney works and is a good option when one’s budget is limited.
Cranks and Bottom Bracket Comparison
Shimano Claris Cranks | Shimano Tourney Cranks | |
Number of Chainrings | 2-3 | 2-3 |
Design | 2-piece | 3-piece |
Crank Arm Material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Chainring Material | Steel | Steel |
Axle Material | Steel | Steel |
Bottom Bracket | Octalink, Hollowtech II | Square Taper |
Bottom Bracket Weight | about 260g | about 355g |
Chainring Connection | Bolts | Rivets |
The main advantages of Claris cranks over Tourney are:
- Compatible with modern bottom brackets
- Bolted connection (The chainrings of Claris cranks connect to the crank arms via bolts and are therefore replaceable. Meanwhile, Tourney’s cranks are riveted. When a chainring wears down, the crank arms have to be replaced too.)
- Lighter
Hubs Comparison
Shimano Claris Hubs | Shimano Tourney Hubs | |
Speeds | 8/9 | 6,7,8 |
Axle Type | Quick-release | Quick-release |
Brake Type | Rim brakes only | Rim and disc brake options (only for MTB) |
Weight (front) | about 214g | about 200g |
Weight (rear) | about 459g | about 455g |
What Are The Advantages Of Shimano Tourney?
The strongest point of Shimano Tourney components is that they meet the minimum requirements for satisfactory performance without costing too much. This makes them perfect for non-pretentious bikes that are going to serve as commuters or fitness machines.
What Are The Advantages of Shimano Claris?
Claris is a significant step up from Tourney when the main goal is affordable performance. The components look a lot more modern and incorporate the design and quality found in the higher-end groupsets.
Claris is the most logical choice when one is building an affordable road bike that can still offer some decent technical qualities and comfort. Truth be told, some people consider Claris better than Sora because the main difference between the two is the extra speed that Sora comes with it.
Remember That You Can Always Upgrade
At the end of the day, one can always upgrade various groupset components to higher-end models. Not only that, but cassettes, chainrings, and chains are consumables anyway. For that reason, there is no need to get particularly obsessed with purchasing high-end components right away.
The frame, the fork, and the wheels are a lot more important than the cranks, for example. If the bike is of the right size for you and is sufficiently comfortable, you can get by with a cheap set of cranks and shifters until you can afford better ones.